Author: Morgan

  • ‘Russia will not stop until they are forced to do so,’ Danish PM warns as she opens European leaders summit – Europe live | Europe

    [ad_1]

    ‘Russia will not stop until they are forced to do so,’ Denmark’s Frederiksen warns leaders

    Danish prime minister Mette Frederiksen is now opening the formal proceedings.

    Flanked by the European Council president, António Costa, and Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, she says:

    “For the last few months, there has been much talk about peace in Ukraine, with meetings, pre-meetings and briefings about the meetings, and meanwhile, Russia continues its brutal attacks.

    It must be clear to everyone now: Russia will not stop until they are forced to do so.”

    She adds that “we have one major task ahead of us: we have to make our common Europe so strong that war against us becomes unthinkable, and we have to do it now.

    Key events

    Jakub Krupa

    Jakub Krupa

    By the way, you can watch the live stream from the proceedings at the top of this page – or below here.

    European Political Community leaders meet in Copenhagen – watch live

    Share

    Updated at 

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Stars and stripes flags for Trump UK visit had to be changed for brighter red | Donald Trump

    [ad_1]

    Dozens of US flags used for Donald Trump’s unprecedented second state visit to the UK last month had to be replaced because the stripes were the wrong shade of red, a government supplier has claimed.

    The switch of the 66 hand-sewn flags that had been due to be used along the Mall in London and at Windsor Castle cost an estimated £52,800 in public funds.

    Nick Farley, the managing director of the Flag Consultancy, which the government contracts for all big ceremonial events, said the US embassy objected to the £800 flags earmarked for the visit.

    Speaking to the Telegraph, he said: “The Americans decided that the red we use, which is called R01, wasn’t right for them, and that they wanted a cherry red instead, so we had to buy all new flags for this visit.”

    He said the switch meant the stars and stripes featured a brighter shade of red than the union jacks flown alongside them.

    “Their red is now stronger than the red on the union flag,” Farley said. “Before a state visit, we have to provide samples and go to the embassies in London to get signoff. Countries find it insulting if we get our colours wrong.”

    Farley speculated that a sample flag shown to the embassy may have faded slightly due to the sun damage from previous uses including Trump’s first state visit in June 2019.

    He told the Telegraph: “One part of their flag is red. And the one we had in storage was closer to a russet colour, and let’s just say they were unhappy. That’s the problem with flags that are not commonly flown: it is our interpretation versus their interpretation.”

    The US embassy has not commented.

    If confirmed, the switch of flags, would underline the extent to which Trump was indulged by the UK during his unprecedented second visit. The invitation for the visit came in a handwritten letter to Trump, presented by Keir Starmer during his first meeting with the president in the White House in February.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    During the three-day visit to the UK, Trump was entertained by King Charles and other members of the royal family. He was driven round the grounds of Windsor castle to keep him away from protesters, and greeted by Starmer at the prime minister’s country estate at Chequers. At a joint press conference at Chequers a series of dubious claims by Trump went unchallenged by Starmer.

    Trump described the visit as “truly one of the highest honours of my life”.

    A government spokesperson defended the visit, saying: “Our historic US state visit brought record-breaking investment into the UK of £150bn – boosting jobs and catapulting growth.”

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • UK fifth-worst country in Europe for loss of green space to development | Environment

    [ad_1]

    Nature and farmland equivalent in size to that of the New Forest – 604 sq km – was lost to concrete and bricks and mortar in the UK between 2018 and 2023, according to an investigation by the Guardian and European partners.

    In the same period the loss of some of the most protected and special natural areas in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, known as national landscapes, reached 12 sq km; equivalent to 1,680 football pitches worth of natural land.

    The exclusive analysis – the outcome of a cross-border project conducted by the Guardian, Arena+, the Norsk institutt for naturforskning (Nina), the Norwegian broadcaster NRK and nine other news outlets in 11 countries across Europe, estimated that natural areas equivalent in size to Cyprus were lost across the continent in the same period.

    The UK was among the countries to lose the highest proportion of green space compared to its geographic size. It ranked fifth.

    A map showing the
    Within the High Wealds area of outstanding natural beauty, the investigation identified numerous small and large developments in the period between 2018 and 2023

    The findings underline the tensions and economic trade-off between the environmental loss of natural capital from development and the economic gains of residential and industrial development and their subsequent value to GDP.

    The research used before-and-after satellite imagery shots to determine the change in land use – utilising a supervised machine learning developed by Nina. The investigation revealed the significant scale of building on beauty spots designated as areas of outstanding natural beauty, now known as national landscapes in England and Wales.

    Huge tracts of national landscapes are being taken for development, the data suggests, despite restrictions on the development of these natural areas.

    The Guardian verified more than 250 of the largest developments, which were more than 10,000 sq metres; developments of this size had been undertaken in six areas of national landscapes: the Chilterns, Kent Downs, North Wessex Downs, Dorset, the Cotswolds, High Weald and the Shropshire Hills.

    The research suggests that special protections in such areas are being trumped by local developments – including residential, transport and commercial projects – but also by national construction projects.

    One major project – the controversial HS2 train line, once seen as a vital piece of infrastructure to connect the north and south of England, which will now connect only London and Birmingham – cuts directly through the Chilterns national landscape and is clearly visible in the satellite imagery captured for the purposes of this project.

    An oak tree felled by HS2 within the compound in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire in 2021. Photograph: Maureen McLean/REX/Shutterstock

    Most of the large projects highlighted by the analysis, beside HS2, that have spilled into the areas of outstanding natural beauty are housing developments, such as the northward expansion of Poundbury in Dorset, the Lancaster Park development near Hungerford in Berkshire, and a field of new houses to the north-east of Fownhope in Hereford. More still are small encroachments: barns, extensions and road widening projects.

    Recent research has revealed there are enough brownfield sites in England to build almost all the 1.5m homes that the government wants to create by the end of this parliament.

    skip past newsletter promotion

    Roger Mortlock, chief executive of the countryside charity CPRE, said: “For a small island we are still struggling with the idea that land is finite. It’s shameful to be so near the top of this list when the countryside in this country is so valued – second only to the NHS.

    “It is also so unnecessary when brownfield land, even with planning permission, remains unused. We should rethink our towns and cities as compact sustainable places that celebrate the countryside on their doorstep.

    “Instead land-hungry, car-dependent, identikit, unaffordable housing estates without proper infrastructure are taking green fields that could deliver the food we eat, power nature’s recovery and climate solutions.”

    The Guardian revealed recently the government’s new planning bill threatens 5,000 of the most protected areas in England. The bill, currently going through parliament, is considered a regression on current environmental laws, and would allow developers to pay into a central fund in order to bypass environmental regulations on a particular site.

    Additional reporting by Rachel Keenan, Raphael Boyd, Olivia Lee, Yassin El-Moudden, Gracie Daw, Matthew Holmes, Mariam Amini, Gabriel Smith, Dominic Kendrick and Emma Russell

    For more, visit greentogrey.eu

    The next phase of this project will be planet-wide: join a crowdsourced citizen science initiative to measure global nature loss here

    [ad_2]

    Source link

  • Europe’s air safety at risk amid cost-cutting and staff pressures, study warns | Airline industry

    [ad_1]

    Pilots and cabin crew at European airlines feel increasingly under pressure to work long hours and hide signs of tiredness at the expense of safety, according to a major study.

    Cost cutting and profit chasing at airlines has “systemically weakened” safety, and many exhausted employees feel too intimidated to challenge management decisions, the research by Ghent University in Belgium found.

    The study, which involved 6,900 workers, also found concerns among cabin crew who reported feeling pushed into making onboard sales of perfumes and alcohol, presenting a conflict with their role in keeping passengers safe and well.

    The report found that the Covid pandemic had accelerated a decline in working conditions.

    Researchers said a generation of senior pilots had left the industry, replaced by younger, cheaper and more flexible workers who were more likely to accept precarious contracts that weaken their ability to uphold standards.

    Asked about whether they felt confident in pushing back against decisions that felt potentially unsafe, more than half of respondents to the survey said they did not feel able to “modify instructions” from management based on safety objections. The results showed a deterioration since a 2014 study, also by Ghent University, which found 82% of pilots said they felt able to modify instructions.

    About 30% of pilots said they were sometimes reluctant to take safety decisions out of fear of possible negative consequences for their professional career.